"Constitutional Democracy" - Bruce Ackerman

"Constitutional Democracy" - Bruce Ackerman

One of the prominent legal and philosophical works that explores the relationship between constitutions and democracy, and how constitutional elements can interact with democratic principles to achieve a just governance system. In this article, Ackerman explains how constitutions can be amended in line with evolving democratic values, ensuring that the constitutional system does not remain static but evolves over time to accommodate social and political changes.

Definition of Constitutional Democracy
In his article "Constitutional Democracy," Ackerman presents the idea that democracy is not solely about the principle of rule by the people through free elections. It also encompasses legal principles and frameworks that guarantee individual rights and ensure adherence to the fundamental laws of the state. Constitutional democracy implies a balance between democratically elected governments and legal boundaries that cannot be crossed to safeguard fundamental rights.

The Concept of Constitutional Amendment
One of the key concepts discussed by Ackerman is constitutional amendment. He argues that constitutions must be flexible enough to keep pace with societal changes and that the process of amending the constitution is not limited to formal and complex procedures. Instead, constitutional changes can occur through ordinary political practices that reflect popular consensus on fundamental shifts in governance.

Ackerman emphasizes that the constitution should remain a living document that reflects political and social transformations in society. New generations should be able to amend legal and human rights values to align with their needs and aspirations while maintaining protections for fundamental rights and freedoms.

Pluralistic Democracy and the Balance Between Majorities and Minorities
Through constitutional democracy, Ackerman highlights that the legal system must respect minority rights, even under majority rule. Democracy does not simply mean that the majority decides all matters; there must be constitutional guarantees that protect minority rights and prevent majorities from infringing on individual rights.

It is crucial to establish constitutional mechanisms that safeguard individuals from laws that could be harmful or discriminatory against specific groups, such as laws that may violate the rights of racial or religious minorities.

The Principle of "Majoritarian Change"
Ackerman introduces the concept of "Majoritarian Change" in the constitution, suggesting that constitutional amendments can occur when significant changes in national understanding and political power take place. He argues that fundamental changes—those that go beyond minor policy adjustments and involve rethinking core rights and governmental practices—require a broad national consensus and shifts in major political directions.

Conclusion
Ultimately, Ackerman advocates for the idea that constitutional democracy is a dynamic process requiring integration between the constitution and evolving politics. The constitution should be understood as a living framework that adapts to social and political transformations.

In this context, the United Arab Emirates serves as an example of how legal frameworks can be developed in line with modern changes while preserving core values that protect individual rights. Despite challenges, the UAE remains committed to developing a legal democracy that strengthens its citizens' rights and supports sustainable progress.

Like it? Share it.